Saturday, April 05, 2025

Goodbye, ICC Opinion Piece Atty. Harry Roque

Goodbye, ICC

Opinion Piece

Atty. Harry Roque

05 April 2025

Many Filipinos have asked me if I felt shocked seeing former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte being brought to The Hague, The Netherlands.

Sad, yes. But shocked, no!

In November 2017, I was designated a peso-a-year Presidential Adviser for Human Rights concurrent with my position as Presidential Spokesperson, where I had been advising fPRRD on matters pertaining to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

I knew this day would come and I even proposed a Communication Plan on the ICC during my time as Spokesperson but the idea was shot down.

I find it rather unfortunate that no one, including fPRRD, had taken me seriously. ICC is something fPRRD and his close legal advisers could not even fathom for it is unthinkable to have an ICC to begin with.

Fastforward 2024. There were loud whispers of the arrival of the International Criminal Court ICC investigators in Manila to investigate the Duterte administration’s war on illegal drugs coincided with the hearings of the House of Representatives Quad Committee (Quadcom).

While commercial mainstream media is silent about the ICC investigators’ secret visit to House Speaker Martin Romualdez and their stay in a posh hotel reportedly owned by a Romualdez minion, social media had been abuzz with these persistent reports, with erstwhile Marcos loyalist vlogger Maharlika even exposing the passports of the ICC investigators.

The ICC investigators’ visit took place at a time when Former President Duterte appeared before the 11th Quadcom hearing, where he famously said and I quote, “The ICC does not scare me a bit. I go to hell, so be it. Ginawa ko para sa bayan, para sa anak natin.”

As a member of the ICC roster of counsel since 2004, I have consistently argued that the ICC lost its authority to probe or prosecute individuals involved in the war on drugs campaign.

The Philippines deposited a notice of withdrawal on March 17,2018. It became official on March 17, 2019. The Court Prosecutor failed to trigger the Court’s jurisdiction before our withdrawal became effective on March 17, 2019.

As contended by two Appellate Chamber judges, the Prosecutor can no longer open a preliminary investigation once the State’s withdrawal officially took effect.

It was only in 2021, or two years after we officially left the Court that the PTC approved the commencement of a preliminary investigation.

Whether he admits it or not, President Marcos Jr. committed a colossal blunder when he shamelessly handed over private citizen Rodrigo Duterte to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in a silver platter.

Here is what has been officially established so far on the March 11 kidnapping of the former President. My reference is the preliminary findings report of the 20 March 2025 Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearing.

First finding, the Philippines has no legal obligation to arrest the former President and to turn him over to the ICC. There was no Red Notice and what was received was only a Diffusion Notice. Likewise, there was no indication that the ICC even requested for the surrender of fPRRD or a request to extradite the Filipino leader.

The Senate hearing further trashed the argument of the Justice Secretary that while the Philippines is not under the ICC jurisdiction, the individuals themselves are still under the ICC jurisdiction.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) customary law does not apply. IHL refers to war crimes and fPRRD is accused of committing crimes against humanity, and not war crimes.

Second finding, the Philippine government has decided to collaborate with the ICC to arrest fPRRD. Last Wednesday 02 April 2025, ICC Spokepserson Dr. Fadi El Abdallah categorically said that “the surrender of Mr. Duterte was the decision of Philippine authorities.” Even The New York Time published on 20 March 2025 that the Philippine polic had prepared a secret 80-page plan referred to as “Operation Pursuit” on how to detain fPRRD.

Third finding, there were glaring violations of the rights of FPPRD. There was no warrant issued by a Philippine court or a court order issued mandating that the former President be taken out of the Philippine against his will.

Former President Duterte was also deprived of the right to be visited or have conferences with immediate members of his family. Vice President Inday Sara Duterte, who was the counsel of choice of fPRRD was not allowed to go inside Villamor Sir Base.

FPRRD was also denied to be brought to judicial authorities under Article 59 of the Rome Statute. The Department of Justice was the one which acted as the competent judicial authority.

Having said this, our legal proceedings are an integral part of our sovereignty and jurisdiction. The Constitution vests judicial power in one Supreme Court and lower courts established by law. Jurisdiction allows our government to enact a law (legislative jurisdiction), enforce the law (executive jurisdiction) and penalize those who violate the law (judicial jurisdiction). The State can only share judicial jurisdiction with an alien entity under a treaty. We junked our ICC membership six years ago.

Bad news for the public officials who allowed the ICC to do its bidding have committed culpable violations of the Constitution.

More bad news, too, to the ICC. Hungary, a founding member of the ICC, has decided that it will withdraw from the ICC shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived in Budapest. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, in a news conference, said that the ICC “has been diminished to a political tool and Hungary wishes to play no role in it.” We expect more withdrawals to come soon. Pilipinas lang ang bangag na bangag sa ICC. Goodbye, ICC!

#HarryRoque #SpoxNgBayan #BringPRRDHome #GabayPartylist

Thursday, April 03, 2025

Why Does God Give Revelation for the Church Only to the Presiding Prophet?



“But, behold, verily, verily, I say unto thee, no one shall be appointed to receive commandments and revelations in this church excepting my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., for he receiveth them even as Moses.” Doctrine and Covenants 28:2

The Know

In September 1830, Joseph Smith faced what Casey Paul Griffiths has called “the first ecclesiastical crisis in the young Church.”1 The Lord had previously revealed that Joseph Smith “was called of God, and ordained an apostle of Jesus Christ, to be the first elder of this church” (Doctrine and Covenants 20:2). That same day, the Lord had also declared that the Saints should “give heed unto all his words and commandments which he shall give unto you as he receiveth them, walking in all holiness before me; for his word ye shall receive, as if from mine own mouth, in all patience and faith” (Doctrine and Covenants 21:4–5).

Despite these clear expressions, the Church was still less than six months old, and some members did not yet fully understand the full implications of these revelatory instructions. This was especially made clear when Hiram Page, one of the Eight Witnesses, issued two alleged revelations “concerning the upbuilding of Zion, [and] the order of the Church” through a stone.2 Some members of the Church in Fayette, including Oliver Cowdery and the Whitmer family, knew that Joseph Smith used a seer stone to receive revelations in the past, and so they were willing to believe that Hiram Page had also made use of a similar stone.3

When Joseph arrived in Fayette for the upcoming September conference of the Church, he was shocked to find so many stalwart members believing these revelations “which were entirely at variance with the order of God’s house, as laid down in the New Testament, as well as in our late revelations.”4 After spending a night in prayer and discussing the matter thoroughly with Oliver and the Whitmers, Joseph received the revelation now known as Doctrine and Covenants 28.

This revelation clarified, “No one shall be appointed to receive commandments and revelations in this church excepting my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., for he receiveth them even as Moses. . . . For I have given him the keys of the mysteries, and the revelations which are sealed, until I shall appoint unto them another in his stead. . . . For all things must be done in order, and by common consent in the church, by the prayer of faith” (Doctrine and Covenants 28:2, 7, 13; see also 35:18).

Even though the Lord clearly outlined on that occasion that only the prophet could receive revelation directing the Church and also how He would choose another leader for the Church after Joseph Smith, the same issue was raised a few months later in February 1831, when a woman identified as Mrs. Hubble would likewise claim to be receiving revelation for the entire Church.5 Again, the Lord reiterated that “there is none other appointed unto you to receive commandments and revelations” except the living prophet, and “none else shall be appointed unto this gift except it be through him. . . . And this shall be a law unto you, that ye receive not the teachings of any that shall come before you as revelations or commandments; and this I give unto you that you may not be deceived, that you may know they are not of me. For verily I say unto you, that he that is ordained of me shall come in at the gate and be ordained as I have told you before, to teach those revelations which you have received and shall receive through him whom I have appointed” (Doctrine and Covenants 43:3–7).

In another revelation received in 1835, the Lord further clarified that “the duty of the President of the office of the High Priesthood is to preside over the whole church, and . . . to be a seer, a revelator, a translator, and a prophet, having all the gifts of God which he bestows upon the head of the church” (Doctrine and Covenants 107:91–92). Thus, any new scripture for the Church—whether it be new revelations or inspired translations of scripture like the Book of Mormon or Book of Abraham—would only come through one who has presiding authority over the entire church.

Just as the Lord had promised, He did appoint a successor to Joseph Smith that was able and authorized to receive revelations for the Church following Joseph’s death. In March 1844, Joseph Smith met with the Twelve Apostles and bestowed upon them all the keys they would need to lead the Church. According to Orson Hyde, Joseph declared, “Upon the shoulders of the Twelve must the responsibility of leading this church hence forth rest until you shall appoint others to succeed you. . . . I roll the burthen and responsibility of leading this church off from my shoulders on to yours. Now, round up your shoulders and stand under it like men.”6

This law of succession was articulated in 1835, when the Lord provided that the Twelve, as a body, “form a quorum equal in authority and power to the three presidents [in the First Presidency]” (Doctrine and Covenants 107:24). When the prophet passes away, the senior apostle in each successive case is set apart by the Quorum of the Twelve as the next President of the Church. He is then able to reorganize the First Presidency and be sustained by the body of the Church. These keys have continuously been passed down in this manner until today. Therefore, any new revelation or scripture is authorized to come only through the living prophet of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, following these revelations and principles that the Lord has repeatedly declared.7

The Why

After Joseph Smith received section 28 and read it at the September 1830 conference of the Church, Newel Knight recorded, “B[r]other Page as well as . . . the whole Church who were present renounced the Said Stone and all things connected with it, much to our satisfaction and happiness.”8 Emer Harris further noted that Hiram Page’s stone “was broke to powder and the writings burnt.”9

Ultimately, these early challenges “centered around one simple question: In a church in which anyone can receive revelation, who has the right to receive revelation for the whole church?”10 In both cases and elsewhere in Joseph Smith’s revelations, the answer was always the same: while individuals can receive revelation for their own lives or over their duly authorized stewardships, only the Lord’s presiding prophet can receive revelation for the whole Church.

Joseph would sum up this principle when he later wrote, “It is contrary to the economy of God for any member of the church or anyone to receive instruction for those in authority higher than themselves,” and therefore, any revelation would strictly be “for their own benefit and instruction, for the fundamental principles, government, and doctrine of the church is invested in the keys of the kingdom.”11

Following these repeated and clear instructions the Lord has given, this has been the consistent teaching of the prophets and apostles ever since. For example, President Dallin H. Oaks recently taught about the difference between personal revelation and revelation given to leaders of the Church, declaring each to be a vital line of communication. The personal line involves receiving answers to prayers and “is the source of our testimony of truth, of our knowledge, and of our personal guidance from a loving Heavenly Father”; the priesthood line—revelation given to the prophet—“is the channel by which God has spoken to His children through the scriptures in times past. And it is this line through which He currently speaks through the teachings and counsel of living prophets and apostles and other inspired leaders.”12 Both are necessary lines of communication with our Heavenly Father.

Elder Dale G. Renlund has also recently related that an individual reached out to him and “told me it had been revealed to him that additional scripture was buried under the ground floor of a building he tried to enter. He claimed that once he obtained the additional scripture, he knew he would receive the gift of translation, bring forth new scripture, and shape the doctrine and direction of the Church.” Elder Renlund told him that he was mistaken and further taught the Saints, “I did not need to pray about this request for one simple but profound reason: only the prophet receives revelation for the Church.”13

President Joseph Fielding Smith also taught, “The Lord will give his revelations in the proper way, to the one who is appointed to receive and dispense the word of God to the members of the Church.”14 These principles have been given to the world “that you may not be deceived” (Doctrine and Covenants 43:6).15 As modern disciples of Christ hold to this principle, the blessings of the Lord can flow freely upon them.

Further Reading

Dennis A. Wright, “The Hiram Page Stone: A Lesson in Church Government,” in The Doctrine and Covenants: A Book of Answers, ed. Leon R. Hartshorn, Dennis A. Wright, and Craig J. Ostler (Deseret Book, 1996), 85–94.

Dale G. Renlund, “A Framework for Personal Revelation,” October 2022 general conference.

Dallin H. Oaks, “Two Lines of Communication,” October 2010 general conference.

A. Gary Anderson, “Being Valiant by Following the Lord’s Anointed,” in The Heavens Are Open: The 1992 Sperry Symposium on the Doctrine and Covenants and Church History (Deseret Book, 1993), 34–47.

Leaun G. Otten, “Protection Against Deception,” in Heavens Are Open, 243–56.

Footnotes

1. Casey Paul Griffiths, Scripture Central Commentary on the Doctrine and Covenants, 4 vols. (Scripture Central; Cedar Fort, 2024), 1:273.

2. “History, 1838–1856, volume A-1 [23 December 1805–30 August 1834],” p. 54, The Joseph Smith Papers. According to Emer Harris, the brother of Martin Harris, these alleged revelations were about sixteen pages long. See Emer Harris statement in “Provo Utah Central Stake General Minutes, 1849–1977, Volume 10, 1855–1860,” April 6, 1856, 273, LR 9629 11, Church History Library, Salt Lake City.

3. For more context behind this event, see Steven C. Harper, Making Sense of the Doctrine and Covenants: A Guided Tour Through Modern Revelations (Deseret Book, 2008), 95–96; Steven C. Harper, Doctrine and Covenants Contexts (Scripture Central, 2021), 58–59; Griffiths, Scripture Central Commentary, 1:273–75; Jeffrey G. Cannon, “‘All Things Must Be Done in Order,’” in Revelations in Context: The Stories Behind the Sections of the Doctrine and Covenants, ed. Matthew McBride and James Goldberg (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 2016), 50–53; A. Gary Anderson, “The Prophet, Seer, and Revelator (D&C 28 and 43), in Studies in Scripture, vol. 1, The Doctrine and Covenants, ed. Robert L. Millet and Kent P. Jackson (Deseret Book, 1989), 148–52.

4. “History, 1838–1856, volume A-1 [23 December 1805–30 August 1834],” p. 54, The Joseph Smith Papers; spelling and punctuation modernized.

5. While it is not clear who Mrs. Hubble was, John Whitmer noted that she “professed to be a prophetess of the Lord, and professed to have many revelations, and knew that the Book of Mormon was true; and that she should become a teacher in the Church of Christ.” “John Whitmer, History, 1831–circa 1847,” p. 18, The Joseph Smith Papers; spelling and punctuation modernized. She had apparently deceived many new converts, warranting this revelation. For more context, see Harper, Making Sense of the Doctrine and Covenants, 147–51; Harper, Doctrine and Covenants Contexts, 94–96; Griffiths, Scripture Central Commentary, 2:33–34; Cannon, “‘All Things Must Be Done in Order,’” 50–53; Anderson, “Prophet, Seer, and Revelator,” 152–54.

6. “Appendix 3: Orson Hyde, Statement about Quorum of the Twelve, circa Late March 1845,” pp. 1–2, The Joseph Smith Papers.

7. For a more complete discussion of prophetic succession in the Church, see Martin L. Hickman, “Succession in the Presidency,” in Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 4 vols., ed. Daniel H. Ludlow (Macmillan, 1992), 3:1420–21.

8. Michael Hubbard MacKay and William G. Hartley, eds., The Rise of the Latter-day Saints: The Journals and Histories of Newel Knight (Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University; Deseret Book, 2019), 22.

9. “Provo Utah Central Stake General Minutes,” 273. Two other traditions regarding the fate of Hiram’s stone are related in Stephen E. Robinson and H. Dean Garrett, A Commentary on the Doctrine and Covenants, 4 vols. (Deseret Book, 2000), 1:188–89, as two stones are maintained to be the stone used by Hiram Page that were in the RLDS Archives or private possession.

10. Griffiths, Scripture Central Commentary, 1:273.

11. “Letter to John S. Carter, 13 April 1833,” p. 30, The Joseph Smith Papers; spelling and punctuation modernized.

12. Dallin H. Oaks, “Two Lines of Communication,” October 2010 general conference.

13. Dale G. Renlund, “A Framework for Personal Revelation,” October 2022 general conference.

14. Joseph Fielding Smith, in Conference Report, April 1938, 65–67; see also Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, vol. 1 of 3 (Bookcraft, 1954), 288.

15. For more discussions on this principle, see A. Gary Anderson, “Being Valiant by Following the Lord’s Anointed,” in The Heavens Are Open: The 1992 Sperry Symposium on the Doctrine and Covenants and Church History (Deseret Book, 1993), 34–47; Leaun G. Otten, “Protection Against Deception,” in Heavens Are Open, 243–56.

Tuesday, April 01, 2025

Which Church To Join?

Which Church To Join?

Joseph didn't go to the grove to organize another church. He went to pray and ask God which church to join. The rest is our history and foundation of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

"If I had not experienced what I have, I should not have believed it myself. I never did harm any man since I have been born into the world. My voice is always for peace, I cannot lie down until all my work is finished. I never think any evil nor do anything to the harm of my fellowman. When I am called at the trump of the archangel and weighed in the balance, you will all know me then.”

—Joseph Smith Jr

"I have no enemies but for the truth's sake. I have no desire but to do all men good. I feel to pray for all men. We don't ask any people to throw away any good they have got; we only ask them to come and get more."

-Joseph Smith Jr

"The Standard of Truth has been erected; no unhallowed hand can stop the work from progressing; persecutions may rage, mobs may combine, armies may assemble, calumny may defame, but the truth of God will go forth boldly, nobly, and independent, till it has penetrated every continent, visited every clime, swept every country, and sounded in every ear, till the purposes of God shall be accomplished, and the Great Jehovah shall say the work is done.”

― Joseph Smith Jr

"Take away the Book of Mormon and the revelations, and where is our religion? We have none. "

― Joseph Smith Jr

“The best way to obtain truth and wisdom is not to ask from books, but to go to God in prayer, and obtain divine teaching.”

― Joseph Smith Jr

“I told them I was but a man, and they must not expect me to be perfect; if they expected perfection from me, I should expect it from them; but if they would bear with my infirmities and the infirmities of the brethren, I would likewise bear with their infirmities.”

― Joseph Smith Jr

“If men do not comprehend the character of God, they do not comprehend themselves…”If the veil were rent today, and the great God who holds the world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds and all things by His power, was to make Himself visible, – I say, if you were to see Him today, you would see Him like a man in form – like yourself in all the person, image, and very form as a man.”

― Joseph Smith Jr.

"The Saints can testify whether I am willing to lay down my life for my brethren. If it has been demonstrated that I have been willing to die for a ‘Mormon.’ I am bold to declare before Heaven that I am just as ready to die in defending the rights of a Presbyterian, a Baptist, or a good man of any other denomination; for the same principle which would trample upon the rights of the Latter-day Saints would trample upon the rights of the Roman Catholics, or of any other denomination who may be unpopular and too weak to defend themselves.”

-Joseph Smith Jr