Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Did Rockefeller “invent” eating 3–6 times a day to sell food?



No historical evidence supports the claim that John D. Rockefeller or the Rockefeller Foundation created the idea of eating 3–6 meals a day.

People have eaten multiple meals per day long before the Rockefellers existed:


Before Rockefeller (Ancient–1800s)

Ancient Romans: Usually 2 meals/day

Medieval Europe: 2–3 meals/day

Industrial Revolution: Workers started eating 3 meals/day because of factory schedules


The 3-meal pattern became routine because of work hours, not billionaires.


Where did “eat 5–6 small meals” come from?


This idea became popular much later, around the 1970s–1990s, pushed by:


 Bodybuilders & fitness magazines


They promoted 5–6 meals to:

“Boost metabolism” (which we now know is not really true)

Keep protein intake constant

Avoid hunger during long training days


 Nutritionists & diet programs


Registered dietitians in the 80s–90s used small, frequent meals for:

Blood sugar management

Weight-loss strategies

Appetite control


 Food companies (yes, partly)


Snacks, cereals, and packaged foods did benefit from the idea of eating more frequently — but they did not invent the concept. They simply marketed around it.


Modern Science Today


Current research shows:


You can lose weight or stay healthy with:

1 meal/day (OMAD)

2 meals/day

3 meals/day

6 meals/day


As long as:

Calories are controlled

Protein is high

Quality of food is good

Meal timing supports your lifestyle


There is no single “correct” number of meals.




📌 Coach Noel Fitness Insight 


For fat loss, muscle gain, and metabolic health, the best structure is the one the client can sustain:


For most clients:

3 meals + 1 protein snack works best

Keeps hunger low

Supports training

Helps hit protein targets


But not because of Rockefeller —

because of habit, convenience, and adherence.


Summary


 The idea “Rockefeller created 3–6 meals a day to sell food” is not historically accurate.

 Food companies did take advantage of the idea, but they didn’t invent it.

 Humans have eaten multiple meals per day for centuries.

 Modern science says meal frequency is flexible — choose what fits the goal.




#NutritionFacts

#FitnessMyths

#MealFrequency

#CoachNoel

#HaveFunKeepFit

#HealthEducation

#FatLossTips

#MuscleGainTips

#FitnessUAE

#WellnessGuide

@havefunkeepfit

@CoachOel

@InCaseYouMissed


Sunday, February 08, 2026

Alex vs. Alexandrova: When “No Time to Think” Became a Strategy


Why Alex Eala Lost to Ekaterina Alexandrova


So… did Alex Eala lose because Alexandrova was “too strong”?

No. She lost because Ekaterina played like she drank triple espresso and woke up choosing violence and flat winners.


Let’s break it down, with comedy but facts:


1. “Was Ekaterina really THAT strong?”

Yes. Not gym-strong — style-strong.

Alexandrova’s game is basically:

  • “Ball? I hit. No time to think.”
  • “Bounce? Optional.”
  • “Topspin? Never heard of her.”

She takes the ball early like someone in a hurry for a dentist appointment.

Players like Alex—who love rhythm and point-building—HATE this style.

It’s like trying to dance waltz with someone doing zumba.

2. “Did she scout Alex’s R16 match?”

ABSOLUTELY.

Ekaterina studied Alex like it was an exam:

  • Attack the second serve? 
  • Smash the backhand? 
  • No long rallies because Alex will cook you? 
  • Hit fast so Alex has no time for her usual magic? 

This wasn’t “Let’s see how it goes.”

This was “I have a PowerPoint presentation on how to beat you.”

3. Biggest factor in the loss?

👉 Experience under pressure.

Not the crowd. Not fear.

Just pure, painful, elite-level shot tolerance.


Alexandrova’s mindset:

“I will hit hard. I will keep hitting hard. I will not stop hitting hard.”


Alex’s shot-making was brilliant in moments…

…but at this level, one rushed decision = scoreboard disaster.

4. “Did ranking matter?”

Indirectly, yes.

Top-30 players have:

  • More reps against big hitters
  • Better instincts
  • PhDs in “What To Do at 30–30”

It’s not intimidation, it’s experience accumulation.


5. “Did the Filipino crowd help?”

Emotionally, yes.

But crowd support CANNOT:

  • Slow down a 180km/h forehand
  • Fix timing when you’re being rushed
  • Tell Ekaterina to calm down and stop hitting rockets

Crowd = bonus, not weapon.

6. “Was it a skill mismatch?”

NO.

It was a style mismatch — the most annoying kind.

Like rock-paper-scissors, but Alexandrova showed up with a chainsaw.

7. “Could Alex have done something different?”

Sure:

  • More slices
  • More height
  • Slow the tempo
  • Attack movement
  • Higher first-serve percentage

But again… you can’t practice “reacting to 0.0002-second bullets” unless you face players like her regularly.


8. Did Alex have “no chance”?

She had a chance — just not a big margin for error.

Against Alexandrova, you need:

  • Your A-game
  • Your backup A-game
  • Your emergency A-game in the bag

This wasn’t a failure.

It was on-the-job training at the elite level.


And the best part? 👇

The thing Alex lacked the most — experience — is the EASIEST to gain.

This loss isn’t a ceiling… it’s a roadma


#AlexEala #TennisPH #SharpAnalysis #TennisComedy #GrowthMindset #MatchExperience #TennisJourney #AbuDhabiOpen #HaveFunKeepFitStyle

@alex.eala

@wtatour

@abudhabitennis

@phtennis

@tennis_in_the_philippines

@philippinetennisacademy